12,240
edits
User talk:Tiddlywinks/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
User talk:Tiddlywinks/Archive 3 (view source)
Revision as of 16:09, 21 February 2017
, 21 February 2017→The route to improve the damage article
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 971: | Line 971: | ||
:The long and short of it is, don't trust anything to Showdown solely. Consider it like Serebii or something: find an alternate source/proof. And don't just guess at what's "likely" or "unlikely". [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | :The long and short of it is, don't trust anything to Showdown solely. Consider it like Serebii or something: find an alternate source/proof. And don't just guess at what's "likely" or "unlikely". [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
::That seems like something I can work with (although it seems a bit restrictive imho, and from all I can tell, I believe I'm generally even slightly more... precautious than you). Depending on how much "Showdown-exclusive" info it will be, I guess I will go to individual talk pages or make up a "public" user page with accumulated contradictions (unless you have a better idea). Thanks! [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ::That seems like something I can work with (although it seems a bit restrictive imho, and from all I can tell, I believe I'm generally even slightly more... precautious than you). Depending on how much "Showdown-exclusive" info it will be, I guess I will go to individual talk pages or make up a "public" user page with accumulated contradictions (unless you have a better idea). Thanks! [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::It's now been more than half a year since I asked you to help me with getting [[User:Nescientist/Damage|my damage improvement]] online/mainspace, but it seems this is not nearly as high on your priority list than on mine. I certainly don't think I'm particularly sensitive, but everytime I notice our [[Damage]] page pop up on my watchlist (in particular with edit summaries like [[Special:Diff/2580287|this]]), my mind goes into some weird state in between sorrow, despair and frantic laughter—and it's getting harder to keep indifference out. | |||
:::So, yeah, overblown patriotic wording aside, I plan to get this done soon (I'm sure it's waay less work compared to some other projects both of us have worked on in the meantime). Anyway, I'd still prefer to bring you aboard (or keep you there), if you do have the time. So, are you in? [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 16:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
== About the page splits mentioned on your userpage... == | == About the page splits mentioned on your userpage... == | ||