13,669
edits
Talk:Legendary Pokémon: Difference between revisions
→Legendary Disputes Part X: Please use link templates, not redirects.
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
(→Legendary Disputes Part X: Please use link templates, not redirects.) |
||
| Line 343: | Line 343: | ||
We have to wait for Nintendo to confirm it--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob Kogan]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 18:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC) | We have to wait for Nintendo to confirm it--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob Kogan]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 18:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I hate to be a bother, but you're missing the colons I had told you about earlier... ----[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#98CC00">Celadonkey</span>]] 19:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC) | :I hate to be a bother, but you're missing the colons I had told you about earlier... ----[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#98CC00">Celadonkey</span>]] 19:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
::"The GTS filter means they are either Legendaries or Mythicals, but we don't know which"—well, they're obviously not Mythicals, so, by using the process of elemination, we can conclude that they must be Legendaries. Therefore, the GTS should be enough to prove that they are Legendaries; however, it seems like the staff wants to wait for official confirmation, which I can understand, even if I disagree. But, I haven't found any official confirmation for | ::"The GTS filter means they are either Legendaries or Mythicals, but we don't know which"—well, they're obviously not Mythicals, so, by using the process of elemination, we can conclude that they must be Legendaries. Therefore, the GTS should be enough to prove that they are Legendaries; however, it seems like the staff wants to wait for official confirmation, which I can understand, even if I disagree. But, I haven't found any official confirmation for {{p|Marshadow}} either, so by that logic, shouldn't we delete that article? —[[User:MartinZ|MartinZ]] ([[User talk:MartinZ|talk]]) 20:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::Marshadow is in the games. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 21:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC) | :::Marshadow is in the games. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 21:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::I think MartinZ's point was that they haven't been officially confirmed to exist. IIRC, in Gen VI, we didn't have pages for Diancie, Hoopa, or Volcanion until they were announced. ----[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#98CC00">Celadonkey</span>]] 01:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC) | ::::I think MartinZ's point was that they haven't been officially confirmed to exist. IIRC, in Gen VI, we didn't have pages for Diancie, Hoopa, or Volcanion until they were announced. ----[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#98CC00">Celadonkey</span>]] 01:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::::Per [[Talk:Marshadow (Pokémon)#Officially Revealed?]], that's because at that time, datamining for the 3DS wasn't yet verifiable by the staff, so it was unknown whether those Pokemon actually existed or were being faked. The staff are now able to verify 3DS datamining, so Marshadow has its own page because it's confirmed to exist in the Sun and Moon data. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 01:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC) | |||