30,374
edits
User talk:Tiddlywinks/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Pokemon Type Combinations
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1,410: | Line 1,410: | ||
I have to say you've been quite rude, intolerant, and narrow-minded. By refusing to acknowledge the double-standard and hypocrisy of allowing the redundant use of ''unique combinations'' to be disallowed on one page but allowed on another. Not only that but claiming that fixing a minor error is pedantic behaviour. Your intolerance and narrow-mindedness is excessive and your unwillingness to accept that perhaps you can be wrong is disgusting. You revert to edit wars, Ad Hominem, and downright pretentiousness as evidence to your beliefs. Your immature and child-like methods grow tiresome. --[[User:Disgraced|Disgraced]] ([[User talk:Disgraced|talk]]) 14:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC) | I have to say you've been quite rude, intolerant, and narrow-minded. By refusing to acknowledge the double-standard and hypocrisy of allowing the redundant use of ''unique combinations'' to be disallowed on one page but allowed on another. Not only that but claiming that fixing a minor error is pedantic behaviour. Your intolerance and narrow-mindedness is excessive and your unwillingness to accept that perhaps you can be wrong is disgusting. You revert to edit wars, Ad Hominem, and downright pretentiousness as evidence to your beliefs. Your immature and child-like methods grow tiresome. --[[User:Disgraced|Disgraced]] ([[User talk:Disgraced|talk]]) 14:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I've tried to explain to you why it's not "hypocrisy". For what it's worth, I have not in any of the above meant any particular rudeness or insult or any of the rest you ascribe to me. | |||
:I have not seen anything approaching "proof" that I am substantively wrong in these cases. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 15:11, 14 August 2014 (UTC) | |||