User talk:Metal $onic/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

User talk:Metal $onic/Archive 1 (view source)

Revision as of 01:51, 3 July 2021

153 bytes removed , 3 July 2021

m

no edit summary

Spriteit

Leadership Board, Administrators

38,782

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{User:Alpha Totodile/Template}}
 {{Talk archive}}
-<center>
-Talk archives<br>
-[[User talk:Alpha Totodile|Current]]<br>
-[[User talk:Alpha Totodile/Archive 1|Archive 1]]
-</center>
 ==Welcome==
 {| class="toccolours" style="margin: 0.5em 0; border: 1px solid #3e7614;" cellspacing="1" width="100%"
@@ Line 124: / Line 118: @@
 As stated in the official {{bp|Signature policy}}, sprites or other pictures are not allowed in signatures. Please remove the image in your signature immediately. Thank you. --'''[[User:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#FF7F00">Theryguy</span>]][[User Talk:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">512</span>]]''' 22:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 :What image? My sig looks like this- [[User:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:black;">'''Alpha'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:blue;">'''Totodile'''</span>]] 01:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
-::On [[Talk:Missingno./Featured article candidate|here]], you signature included a picture of a {{p|Ditto}}... --'''[[User:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#FF7F00">Theryguy</span>]][[User Talk:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">512</span>]]''' 11:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
+::On [[Talk:MissingNo./Featured article candidate|here]], you signature included a picture of a {{p|Ditto}}... --'''[[User:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#FF7F00">Theryguy</span>]][[User Talk:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">512</span>]]''' 11:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 :::Actually, it's not part of his signature, for all I know. Instead of inputting "Ditto!", he creatively placed an image of a shiny Ditto. '''<span style="color:#A18DC4">◄</span>[[User:Kevzo8|<span style="color:#98D8D8">Kev</span>]][[User_talk:Kevzo8|<span style="color:#98D8D8">zo8</span>]]<span style="color:#A18DC4">►</span>''' 11:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 ::::Damn conflicts. Ryguy, don't be so quick to judge all the time. ''Ditto'' is a real word, after all. He even wrote it in full at the end of the Support section. And, @[http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATTEchidna&diff=734374&oldid=734152 Alpha Totodile]: no. The talk page is the one I want you all to look at. &mdash; <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] &mdash; 11:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
@@ Line 154: / Line 148: @@
 It's also the case of the History article, because DP should not be a factor until ''after'' the series has run its course; if anything should be written extensively, it should be AG, not DP. We're too close to the subject matter of DP to be writing anything definitive or conclusive. [[User:ArcToraphim|Luna Tiger]] * [[User talk:ArcToraphim|the Arc Toraph]] 18:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
-:Well, I just thought the GymShipping article needed cleaning up. The good Shipping pages ([[PokéShipping]], [[PalletShipping]], [[OrangeShipping]], [[AdvanceShipping]], [[ContestShipping]], [[PearlShipping]], [[IkariShipping]], the list goes on...) have the format with the "This person's hints" and then "This person's hints", and in general, the whole article needed trimming up because some of it, as stated in the edit summary, was completely irrelevant to the article. Some of it was biased and downright wrong. I am a Shipper, but I '''really''' wish that we could put aside our convictions and ''write neutrally''.
+:Well, I just thought the GymShipping article needed cleaning up. The good Shipping pages ([[PokéShipping]], [[PalletShipping]], [[OrangeShipping]], [[AdvanceShipping]], [[ContestShipping]], [[PearlShipping]], {{redlink|IkariShipping}}, the list goes on...) have the format with the "This person's hints" and then "This person's hints", and in general, the whole article needed trimming up because some of it, as stated in the edit summary, was completely irrelevant to the article. Some of it was biased and downright wrong. I am a Shipper, but I '''really''' wish that we could put aside our convictions and ''write neutrally''.
 :As for the history article, that is the current shipping debate, and I know for a fact that the Shippings listed there were added to the whole war after the characters appeared. We can just add more stuff there as things change. [[User:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:black;">'''Alpha'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:blue;">'''Totodile'''</span>]] 20:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
@@ Line 235: / Line 229: @@
 Why did you revert my edit to this page? Usually, when you revert people's edits, you give explanations as to why. I gave a reason why I removed it, and I'd like to know your reason for reverting me back. Thanks, ''[[User:Kevin Y|<font color="darkred">Kevin Y</font>]]'' ([[User talk:Kevin Y|<font color="#083c6b">talk</font>]]) 22:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 :If there are four Pokémon that can learn Ominous Wind of the ten that can learn it leveling up, then trivia like that should stay. --'''[[User:Alpha Totodile|<font color="#DAA520">Alpha</font>]][[User talk:Alpha Totodile|<font color="#C0C0C0">Toto</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Alpha Totodile|<font color="#5f5f5f">dile</font>]]''' 22:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
-::Why is that? Is it because it's a level-up move? In which case I could understand, but there are plenty of {{type2|Normal}} moves that can be learned by a huge amount of non-Normal-type Pokémon. I don't care either way, and I'm not gonna get in a revert war or anything, but I personally would find it a better idea to revert with an explanation in the edit summary (unless it's pure vandalism). Thanks, ''[[User:Kevin Y|<font color="darkred">Kevin Y</font>]]'' ([[User talk:Kevin Y|<font color="#083c6b">talk</font>]]) 22:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
+::Why is that? Is it because it's a level-up move? In which case I could understand, but there are plenty of {{type|Normal}} moves that can be learned by a huge amount of non-Normal-type Pokémon. I don't care either way, and I'm not gonna get in a revert war or anything, but I personally would find it a better idea to revert with an explanation in the edit summary (unless it's pure vandalism). Thanks, ''[[User:Kevin Y|<font color="darkred">Kevin Y</font>]]'' ([[User talk:Kevin Y|<font color="#083c6b">talk</font>]]) 22:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 :::Hey, AT: there's some rule somewhere that says when you revert, give a reason, unless the edit is vandalism. I'm not sure where, but I know I discussed it somewhere on a talk page with the Echidna in Chief. And, if it isn't on a policy page it should be, out of courtesy to the user you're reverting. &mdash; <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] &mdash; 08:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)