Talk:Ilima: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
::::I browsed some Japanese-language sources on the question, and while official sources don't make any indication either way, Japanese fans' interpretations seem to be based on the consensus among "foreign" fans that Ilima is a guy.
::::I browsed some Japanese-language sources on the question, and while official sources don't make any indication either way, Japanese fans' interpretations seem to be based on the consensus among "foreign" fans that Ilima is a guy.


::::The point I'm trying to make isn't that we're holding back on ''adding'' information, but rather we're supposed to hold back on adding ''incorrect'' information. A gender-neutral character isn't a necessarily a blank slate waiting for the "man"/"woman" designation. (What are we going to do, for example, if the US and Japanese versions of the games sidestep the question completely and avoid using gendered language for Ilima altogether? It's not as if I expect the Pokemon company to be progressive enough to write a non-binary character into the mainline series, but if this turned out to be the case, then our reasoning here would basically be "The writers didn't gender Ilima in-game, so we relied on this one pre-release source listing a single 'he' to determine that he is, in fact, male!") The current article is so short as is, it's really not a problem at all to avoid gendered language. --[[User:Arpha|<span style="color:#94C953">A</span><span style="color:#A2D663">r</span><span style="color:#ACDE6F">p</span><span style="color:#B8E87D">h</span><span style="color:#C4F28D">a</span>]] ([[User talk:Arpha|talk]]) 19:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
::::The point I'm trying to make isn't that we're holding back on ''adding'' information, but rather we're supposed to hold back on adding ''incorrect'' information. A gender-neutral character isn't a necessarily a blank slate waiting for the "male"/"female" designation. (What are we going to do, for example, if the US and Japanese versions of the games sidestep the question completely and avoid using gendered language for Ilima altogether? It's not as if I expect the Pokemon company to be progressive enough to write a non-binary character into the mainline series, but if this turned out to be the case, then our reasoning here would basically be "The writers didn't gender Ilima in-game, so we relied on this one pre-release source listing a single 'he' to determine that he is, in fact, male!") The current article is so short as is, it's really not a problem at all to avoid gendered language. --[[User:Arpha|<span style="color:#94C953">A</span><span style="color:#A2D663">r</span><span style="color:#ACDE6F">p</span><span style="color:#B8E87D">h</span><span style="color:#C4F28D">a</span>]] ([[User talk:Arpha|talk]]) 19:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:42, 14 October 2016

Gender confirmation for Ilima

I'm dusting off my account to put in an explanation for Ilima's gender for any browsers or contributors looking to this page for information.

In most languages, the recent trailer and website updates released for Pokemon Sun and Moon avoid using gendered terms for Ilima. The one exception is the Russian version of the website, which states, "Капитан Илима (Ilima) – знаток Покемонов обычного типа. Он окончил Школу для Тренеров, став героем для студентов той школы." I highlighted the gendered words in the text: "он" is the masculine pronoun, and the verbs "окончить" and "стать" are conjugated in the masculine (as Russian verbs need to match the gender of the subject). This -- along with the fact that Ilima's French name (Althéo) and Spanish/Italian name (Liam) are masculine -- is the reason why the prevailing interpretation among Pokemon fans seems to be that Ilima is a guy.

On the other hand, while Russian does have a neuter pronoun ("оно"), it's never used for human beings, so the default for describing a gender-neutral person in Russian would be the masculine pronoun "он." (It would be difficult and awkward to try and reconstruct Ilima's Russian website description without any gender references, since -- as I mentioned earlier -- Russian verbs must conjugate based on the gender of the subject.) Ilima's German name (Elima) is more likely to come across as feminine to German speakers, too. Finally, Ilima's dialogue from the Japanese trailer is polite and gender-neutral.

All things considered, it may be a good idea to reword this page with gender-neutral language until further confirmation (so nobody gets embarrassed when the games release next month). --Arpha (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Captain Ilima is considered a hero by the students of his former school. Tiddlywinks (talk) 18:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
One potential typo on one website (especially in a description that doesn't match the rest of the press copy) doesn't confirmation make. We only have to wait a month, then we can stick a gender in (or not). ETA: The reason why I'm being more stringent here is that this is an easy slip-up for whoever types up the information for these supplementary pages, so it needs more support from other sources (which, right now, are ambiguous). --Arpha (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Holding back on adding information in fear of a typo on the Pokémon Company International's official press site is not the way to go. If it turns out to be a typo, it'll be fixed, but if the official press site is saying that Ilima is male, we're going with that. --Carmen (Talk | contribs) 18:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm fairly sure it is a typo, since a) that's the only English-language source using the pronoun, and b) it doesn't even match up with the official description on the UK version of the Sun/Moon website (which avoids the pronoun). We're essentially taking Lauren Dillon's/Lee Bradley's/Anonymous Intern's word over the rest of the English-language marketing. I don't know if it would be appropriate to actually send an email in and ask them directly if it's a typo (since I'm sure as hell not using my real name and official email for a question like this, and I can't claim to be a Bulbapedia representative).
I browsed some Japanese-language sources on the question, and while official sources don't make any indication either way, Japanese fans' interpretations seem to be based on the consensus among "foreign" fans that Ilima is a guy.
The point I'm trying to make isn't that we're holding back on adding information, but rather we're supposed to hold back on adding incorrect information. A gender-neutral character isn't a necessarily a blank slate waiting for the "male"/"female" designation. (What are we going to do, for example, if the US and Japanese versions of the games sidestep the question completely and avoid using gendered language for Ilima altogether? It's not as if I expect the Pokemon company to be progressive enough to write a non-binary character into the mainline series, but if this turned out to be the case, then our reasoning here would basically be "The writers didn't gender Ilima in-game, so we relied on this one pre-release source listing a single 'he' to determine that he is, in fact, male!") The current article is so short as is, it's really not a problem at all to avoid gendered language. --Arpha (talk) 19:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)