Talk:Amity Square: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 200: Line 200:
According to the posted lists, this isn't supposed to be possible, but, uh, apparently it is.
According to the posted lists, this isn't supposed to be possible, but, uh, apparently it is.


Shroomish found a big leaf in amity square on Pearl. That's not on the list, and unfortunately I cannot venture to guess at it's rarity.
 
== Shroomish can find a big leaf in pearl? ==
 
 
Shroomish found a big leaf in amity square on my Pearl version, literally 10 minutes ago. That's not on the list, and unfortunately I cannot venture to guess at it's rarity. unless someone wants to crack open the coding of amity square, that's all I've got on that, beyond a screenshot for proof.


Attached screenshot for authenticity sake.
Attached screenshot for authenticity sake.
(gimme 10 seconds to upload it, brb.)
 
[[File:Example.jpg]]
Well... apparently I'm not "auto-confirmed" yet, so i cant upload my image. Anyone want to give me a backdoor into that?
 
{{Red link|File:bigleaferror.jpg}}
 
^^ until I can actually ADD that, I suppose I'll just place the big leaf into the list shared by Pikachu and Shroomish. I'm going to venture to guess that, since nobody else seems to have noticed it, it should go under the rare category. If someone wants more out of this, they can get it so that i can upload my image.
 
[[User:Qprime|Qprime]] ([[User talk:Qprime|talk]]) 05:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 
Starting to think Shroomish might have simply been mis-grouped. I just got a blue feather, blue scale, rabuta berry, and white beard. NONE of which shrromish are supposed to be able to find, according to the current list. Other then the rabuta berry, this actually seems to more closely match Jigglypuffs list. Go Figure. I'll hold off on any more changes until this gets looked at for a few days.
 
[[User:Qprime|Qprime]] ([[User talk:Qprime|talk]]) 06:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 
== Possible accessories for each Pokemon ==
 
I updated the wiki page with new accurate data for Pokemon Platinum. I used an emulator with cheat engine and a bot to get a very big drop sample for each Pokemon. Every Pokemon has a drop table of 10 accessories. Certain accessories are more rare than others. You can't own more than 9 copies of the same accessories. The Pokemon will give a berry instead of giving a 10th copy. This means once you have 9 copies of each of the 10 possible accessories, all you can get is berries. All Pokemon give all berries from Cornn to Belue. Trainer Id and Secret Trainer id doesn't affect the accessories. Drop rates for Diamond and Pearl are different.
[[User:RainingChain|RainingChain]] ([[User talk:RainingChain|talk]]) 00:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
:Can you ''only'' get the Berries if you have 9 copies of an Accessory already? Or, like, if you only have 1 of each Accessory, would it be possible to pick up a Berry?
:Also, why did you remove the rarity information entirely? You said you had a large sample (how big?); can you tell us anything about the rates? Or is there maybe a problem, like you didn't track your data well enough to separate when one thing was at max? [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 11:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 
::You can get berries at any time. I've got a berry as my first item once while having no accessories. Some accessories are more rare than others, but not by much. Normally, one of the ten accessories is about x5 more rare than the others. Other accessories have similar rates. I don't believe it's really useful information but I do have the statistics for that if you want. With my setup, I get 1 accessory per second. About the sample size, I ran the bot until I've got 9 copies of all accessories so it's pretty big (around a couple thousand). [[User:RainingChain|RainingChain]] ([[User talk:RainingChain|talk]]) 22:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
:::A relative rarity is good to note. If you can put your results somewhere like pastebin or something, I can see if I can make anything useful of them. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 00:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)