13,284
edits
User talk:Zesty Cactus/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
User talk:Zesty Cactus/Archive 2 (view source)
Revision as of 18:45, 3 January 2010
, 3 January 2010Added tildes---sorry!
No edit summary |
m (Added tildes---sorry!) |
||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
I have discussed this question earlier on Turtwig A's talkpage, and they have come to the conclusion that the question is best reserved for an administrator (such as yourself, Zesty Cactus--you in particular because it seems that you have an unfailing penchant for giving articles cover pictures) | I have discussed this question earlier on Turtwig A's talkpage, and they have come to the conclusion that the question is best reserved for an administrator (such as yourself, Zesty Cactus--you in particular because it seems that you have an unfailing penchant for giving articles cover pictures) | ||
Would it be logical to create a template--like the template used to classify articles for being stubs--that designates book articles as needing pictures of their covers (or otherwise stating that the article 'is lacking important pictures'?) Several books appear to lack pictures of their covers, most notably the book Battle for the Zephyr Badge. Along this, should location stubs possess a similar 'this article needs pictures', to provide a picture of the area described? For example, the article for Sayda Island does not have a picture. | Would it be logical to create a template--like the template used to classify articles for being stubs--that designates book articles as needing pictures of their covers (or otherwise stating that the article 'is lacking important pictures'?) Several books appear to lack pictures of their covers, most notably the book Battle for the Zephyr Badge. Along this, should location stubs possess a similar 'this article needs pictures', to provide a picture of the area described? For example, the article for Sayda Island does not have a picture.[[User:Steph|Steph]] 18:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC) | ||