2,998
edits
Talk:Rotom (Pokémon)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Talk:Rotom (Pokémon)/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 22:15, 27 October 2008
, 27 October 2008→what more proof do you want that Rotom is legendary
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
:Third-party books can, and usually are, error-riddled. As far as we can tell, that handbook saying Rotom is legendary is merely a mistake made by the writers of that handbook. We've never trusted third-party books as a reliable source of information before, why start now? --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 21:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | :Third-party books can, and usually are, error-riddled. As far as we can tell, that handbook saying Rotom is legendary is merely a mistake made by the writers of that handbook. We've never trusted third-party books as a reliable source of information before, why start now? --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 21:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Wait, I thought that this book was a first-party/second-party book (since the copyright implies that it was made by Nintendo and Gamefreak (the guys who made Pokémon in the first place.) I mean, see here '''(c) 2008 Pokémon. 1997-2008 '''''Nintendo, Creatures, GAME FREAK''''', TV Tokyo, ShoPro, JR Kikaku. Pokémon Properties are trademarks of Nintendo'''. | |||
it is legendary i have a AR | it is legendary i have a AR | ||