User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/7: Difference between revisions

Line 1,607: Line 1,607:
Based in part on the minimal support I got on the Editor's Hub, I've been altering disambig pages (only a few in total) as I have reason to edit or create them. But, a short while ago, you just [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Mirage_Forest&curid=43192&diff=2229937&oldid=2219314 reversed] that format on [[Mirage Forest]]. Perhaps you would care to provide me with another opinion on Bulbapedia's format? Perhaps you would even care to put a bit of a bug in staff's ear about this, so that it might actually be discussed rather than languish with barely a single comment. IMO, it doesn't matter how much work might be involved; if it is wrong (and I adamantly believe it is), it should be fixed—or at least officially declared to deserve fixing, so that such work might be known to need doing and may, at the least, be done at convenience, rather than staying wrong forever (and ever). [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 10:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Based in part on the minimal support I got on the Editor's Hub, I've been altering disambig pages (only a few in total) as I have reason to edit or create them. But, a short while ago, you just [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Mirage_Forest&curid=43192&diff=2229937&oldid=2219314 reversed] that format on [[Mirage Forest]]. Perhaps you would care to provide me with another opinion on Bulbapedia's format? Perhaps you would even care to put a bit of a bug in staff's ear about this, so that it might actually be discussed rather than languish with barely a single comment. IMO, it doesn't matter how much work might be involved; if it is wrong (and I adamantly believe it is), it should be fixed—or at least officially declared to deserve fixing, so that such work might be known to need doing and may, at the least, be done at convenience, rather than staying wrong forever (and ever). [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 10:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
:I take your point, although in general I don't have strong feelings about how it should be formatted. However, in the specific case of [[Mirage Forest]], because the text didn't make sense (since it was linking to a section and using that as part of a sentence), I changed it to the other style. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
:I take your point, although in general I don't have strong feelings about how it should be formatted. However, in the specific case of [[Mirage Forest]], because the text didn't make sense (since it was linking to a section and using that as part of a sentence), I changed it to the other style. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
== Japanese guidebook and DexNav/hidden Pokemon ==
I'm in the middle of gathering data on hidden Pokemon attributes, and when I looked at my results for search level 20, they didn't seem greatly different from search level 10 (unlike 4 vs 5 and 5 vs 10, which have significant jumps in attribute rates). I'm going to try looking at search level 25, but I was wondering if you could maybe check the guidebook and see if it really does say that search levels 5, 10, '''20''', 50, and 100 are when attribute rates go up. If I see a more significant difference at 25 than at 20, then I'll assume that the rates at 20 are really the same as at 10, but it'd also be nice if I weren't actually contradicting the guidebook. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 08:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)