User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/7: Difference between revisions

User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/7 (view source)

Revision as of 15:54, 6 January 2015

6 bytes added , 6 January 2015

m

→‎Disambiguation pages format: oh the irony

SnorlaxMonster

Leadership Board, Administrators

77,633

edits

Revision as of 15:54, 6 January 2015 (view source) SnorlaxMonster (talk \| contribs) (→‎Disambiguation pages format) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:54, 6 January 2015 (view source) SnorlaxMonster (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Disambiguation pages format: oh the irony) Newer edit →
Line 1,606:		Line 1,606:

	Based in part on the minimal support I got on the Editor's Hub, I've been altering disambig pages (only a few in total) as I have reason to edit or create them. But, a short while ago, you just [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Mirage_Forest&curid=43192&diff=2229937&oldid=2219314 reversed] that format on [[Mirage Forest]]. Perhaps you would care to provide me with another opinion on Bulbapedia's format? Perhaps you would even care to put a bit of a bug in staff's ear about this, so that it might actually be discussed rather than languish with barely a single comment. IMO, it doesn't matter how much work might be involved; if it is wrong (and I adamantly believe it is), it should be fixed—or at least officially declared to deserve fixing, so that such work might be known to need doing and may, at the least, be done at convenience, rather than staying wrong forever (and ever). [[User:Tiddlywinks\|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks\|talk]]) 10:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)		Based in part on the minimal support I got on the Editor's Hub, I've been altering disambig pages (only a few in total) as I have reason to edit or create them. But, a short while ago, you just [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Mirage_Forest&curid=43192&diff=2229937&oldid=2219314 reversed] that format on [[Mirage Forest]]. Perhaps you would care to provide me with another opinion on Bulbapedia's format? Perhaps you would even care to put a bit of a bug in staff's ear about this, so that it might actually be discussed rather than languish with barely a single comment. IMO, it doesn't matter how much work might be involved; if it is wrong (and I adamantly believe it is), it should be fixed—or at least officially declared to deserve fixing, so that such work might be known to need doing and may, at the least, be done at convenience, rather than staying wrong forever (and ever). [[User:Tiddlywinks\|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks\|talk]]) 10:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
	:I take your point, although in general I don't have strong feelings about how it should be formatted. However, in the specific case of [[Mirage Forest]], because the text didn't make (since it was linking to a section and using that as part of a sentence), I changed it to the other style. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster\|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster\|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)		:I take your point, although in general I don't have strong feelings about how it should be formatted. However, in the specific case of [[Mirage Forest]], because the text didn't make sense (since it was linking to a section and using that as part of a sentence), I changed it to the other style. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster\|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster\|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)