Talk:Pokémon-Amie: Difference between revisions

Line 208: Line 208:


I have theorized that one addition to the data structure for GenVI is a variable-size "extra data" section, which would help facilitate Bank's goal of backwards compatability (by having future generations register their new elements in the section, while older generations would ignore but keep the contents). I think that Affection would have to be in said section in order to remember the OT's Affection level without completly preventing the new trainer from improving Affection. If this is the case (and not it just being done so there are seperate OT and CT (current trainer) Affection values), then it seems logical to me that a reasonable number of trainers could be "remembered". [[User:TruePikachu|--TruePikachu]] ([[User talk:TruePikachu|talk]]) 06:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
I have theorized that one addition to the data structure for GenVI is a variable-size "extra data" section, which would help facilitate Bank's goal of backwards compatability (by having future generations register their new elements in the section, while older generations would ignore but keep the contents). I think that Affection would have to be in said section in order to remember the OT's Affection level without completly preventing the new trainer from improving Affection. If this is the case (and not it just being done so there are seperate OT and CT (current trainer) Affection values), then it seems logical to me that a reasonable number of trainers could be "remembered". [[User:TruePikachu|--TruePikachu]] ([[User talk:TruePikachu|talk]]) 06:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
:From what I tested, affection is only ever (and forever) remembered for the OT. Anyone else will be forgotten. I don't understand how ORAS (or future generations?) is supposed to be change that or what having two "owners" is supposed to mean... [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 11:19, 8 August 2014 (UTC)