5
edits
Talk:Fairy (type): Difference between revisions
→Offensive and Defensive Charactaristics: new section
Mindlord0013 (talk | contribs) (→Offensive and Defensive Charactaristics: new section) |
|||
| Line 254: | Line 254: | ||
:: We shouldn't be disregarding dual-types. Flying can remove Fire, Poison, and Steel's weakness to Ground (unless an external effect such as Smack Down is used), therefore your argument is invalid. --<b>[[User talk:Relicant|<span style="color:#EBEBEB;">The</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Relicant|<span style="color:#F08030;">Truth</span>]]</b> aka Relicant 15:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | :: We shouldn't be disregarding dual-types. Flying can remove Fire, Poison, and Steel's weakness to Ground (unless an external effect such as Smack Down is used), therefore your argument is invalid. --<b>[[User talk:Relicant|<span style="color:#EBEBEB;">The</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Relicant|<span style="color:#F08030;">Truth</span>]]</b> aka Relicant 15:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
::: Slow down there, bud. You can't deny that the quote itself, without any exceptions like Flying or Levitate, is completely true. Had you read my last sentence, you wouldn't have said I was "arguing" to keep it in. If it were up to me, I'd delete the whole section. And… try to be nicer, okay? --<font face="Segoe UI"><span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em">[[User:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="red">The</font>]]Very[[User talk:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="white">Best</font>]]</span></font> 16:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | ::: Slow down there, bud. You can't deny that the quote itself, without any exceptions like Flying or Levitate, is completely true. Had you read my last sentence, you wouldn't have said I was "arguing" to keep it in. If it were up to me, I'd delete the whole section. And… try to be nicer, okay? --<font face="Segoe UI"><span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em">[[User:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="red">The</font>]]Very[[User talk:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="white">Best</font>]]</span></font> 16:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Offensive and Defensive Charactaristics == | |||
I am going to dispute the content of the offensive and defensive charactaristics section of this page. There is too much opinion and use of competitive meta analysis. | |||
"Fairy is widely considered to be the best defensive type" - opinion | |||
"it has a '''key resistance''' to the '''powerfull fighting type''' " - competetitive meta | |||
"resistance to pursuit and U-Turn" - competitive meta | |||
" It has a '''usefull''' immunity to Dragon" - slight opinion (not too bad) | |||
"steel and poison types are rarely, if ever, used offensively" - competitive meta and opinion | |||
"leave them open to the '''common bullet punch'''" - competitive meta (bullet punch is not common by non-competitive standards: It is useable by only 8 pokemon families) | |||
"very strong on offense as well" - opinion | |||
"super effective against Dragon, Dark, fighting, all of which are otherwise great types defensively" - competitive meta | |||
"making fairy and ground a potentially popular attacking combination" - competitive meta | |||
I suggest a total rewrite of this section, and any other sections of type pages that are similarily full of opinion and competitive meta. Taking a look at the Dragon Type page charactarisitcs, that is exactly what this section should be like. | |||