Talk:Hoenn: Difference between revisions

438 bytes added ,  13 October 2009
Line 43: Line 43:
Hey there. It just occured to me that once the main map for Kanto gets ripped from HGSS, all regions will have generation IV maps, apart from poor old Hoenn. Should I make a DP style Hoenn map? --[[User:Cadellin|Cadellin]] 14:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. It just occured to me that once the main map for Kanto gets ripped from HGSS, all regions will have generation IV maps, apart from poor old Hoenn. Should I make a DP style Hoenn map? --[[User:Cadellin|Cadellin]] 14:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
:You should, that seems like a great idea.  Hoenn is being left out of the new generation IV craze.  Although someone might have already done it in the bulbagarden forums... [[User:CKnightsofni|Cknightsofni]]ロケット団が一番ですよ。 22:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
:You should, that seems like a great idea.  Hoenn is being left out of the new generation IV craze.  Although someone might have already done it in the bulbagarden forums... [[User:CKnightsofni|Cknightsofni]]ロケット団が一番ですよ。 22:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
::That raises another question though— why should we use Diamond and Pearl style over HGSS style?  In addition, the Sevii Islands will still be without a Gen IV map: What style would they use? I think we might ought to stick with maps from in-game. But I'm relatively new here, so I'm not sure about policies on maps, so if anyone would like to correct me, go ahead and do so.  --[[User:AndyPKMN|AndyPKMN]] 00:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


== What do you think? ==
== What do you think? ==
1,246

edits