Talk:Fake Pokémon: Difference between revisions

Undo revision 2339778 by Avert (talk) Not sure if this was the conversation you meant to reply to, but wither way it's a 5 year old conversation.
m (A comment in the talk page.)
(Undo revision 2339778 by Avert (talk) Not sure if this was the conversation you meant to reply to, but wither way it's a 5 year old conversation.)
Line 47: Line 47:


==Fake or glitch or what?==
==Fake or glitch or what?==
[[User:Avert|Avert]] ([[User talk:Avert|talk]]) 02:50, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Fake Pokemon should be termed as "Fakemon". Even though I see the benefits of making my own Pokemon for myself, I can also see the legal side of the issue when it comes to copy writes, and patents. We now live in an age where the exact boundaries have to be very distinct in regard to copywrite/personal use policies.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ56Fl4zxfQ&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ56Fl4zxfQ&feature=related
9,382

edits