13,824
edits
Talk:Roughneck (Trainer class): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Regarding this and other similar pages: What do we use for the official article title? The name the trainer class was given in previous generations, or the one it was given in Generation IV? --[[User:PAK Man|PAK Man]] <sup>[[User talk:PAK Man|Talk]]</sup> 13:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | Regarding this and other similar pages: What do we use for the official article title? The name the trainer class was given in previous generations, or the one it was given in Generation IV? --[[User:PAK Man|PAK Man]] <sup>[[User talk:PAK Man|Talk]]</sup> 13:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I'm sick of that debate. This class was always known as CueBall until NoA screwed-up (like always) and renamed it into Roughneck. I'm for reverting that move. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 13:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | :I'm sick of that debate. This class was always known as CueBall until NoA screwed-up (like always) and renamed it into Roughneck. I'm for reverting that move. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 13:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
::And I'm sick of you insisting every subsequent change is a mistake. Look, they've obviously put a lot more care into the Gen. IV translation, as the proper grammar and LACK OF OBNOXIOUS ALLCAPS shows. I'm definitely for using the updated names. --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 19:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||