Bulbapedia talk:Talk page policy: Difference between revisions

I like it. Possibly remove chatty section headings to match tone of a formal policy but that's just one persons opinion.
m (Know this, trom. You Are Not Alone)
 
(I like it. Possibly remove chatty section headings to match tone of a formal policy but that's just one persons opinion.)
Line 2: Line 2:


There's also nothing on signing or <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki>. I think I saw someone told that there's no point putting <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki> on comments more than 6 months old. That's probably the kind of thing that could be made official. And you've got "an staff member" in the "What do I not use talk pages for?" section. <sc>[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</sc> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 09:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
There's also nothing on signing or <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki>. I think I saw someone told that there's no point putting <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki> on comments more than 6 months old. That's probably the kind of thing that could be made official. And you've got "an staff member" in the "What do I not use talk pages for?" section. <sc>[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</sc> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 09:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
:Instead of  ''"How do I use a talk page"'' how about ''"What should a talk page be used for"''. Also possibly remove the first person pronouns from the section headings. The tone in the sections is formal but the headings seem overly chatty and informal and do not strike the requisite note of awe, fear and promises of swift doom to all transgressors. However I am just nit-picking now, it looks good. My two cents, refunds available.--[[User:Beligaronia|Beligaronia]] ([[User talk:Beligaronia|talk]]) 10:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
869

edits