21,781
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Talk page policy: Difference between revisions
Bulbapedia talk:Talk page policy (view source)
Revision as of 11:29, 28 August 2010
, 28 August 2010/cracks whip
Beligaronia (talk | contribs) (I like it. Possibly remove chatty section headings to match tone of a formal policy but that's just one persons opinion.) |
PsychicRider (talk | contribs) m (/cracks whip) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There's also nothing on signing or <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki>. I think I saw someone told that there's no point putting <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki> on comments more than 6 months old. That's probably the kind of thing that could be made official. And you've got "an staff member" in the "What do I not use talk pages for?" section. <sc>[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</sc> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 09:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | There's also nothing on signing or <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki>. I think I saw someone told that there's no point putting <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki> on comments more than 6 months old. That's probably the kind of thing that could be made official. And you've got "an staff member" in the "What do I not use talk pages for?" section. <sc>[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</sc> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 09:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Instead of ''"How do I use a talk page"'' how about ''"What should a talk page be used for"''. Also possibly remove the first person pronouns from the section headings. The tone in the sections is formal but the headings seem overly chatty and informal and do not strike the requisite note of awe, fear and promises of swift doom to all transgressors. However I am just nit-picking now, it looks good. My two cents, refunds available.--[[User:Beligaronia|Beligaronia]] ([[User talk:Beligaronia|talk]]) 10:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | :Instead of ''"How do I use a talk page"'' how about ''"What should a talk page be used for"''. Also possibly remove the first person pronouns from the section headings. The tone in the sections is formal but the headings seem overly chatty and informal and do not strike the requisite note of awe, fear and promises of swift doom to all transgressors. However I am just nit-picking now, it looks good. My two cents, refunds available.--[[User:Beligaronia|Beligaronia]] ([[User talk:Beligaronia|talk]]) 10:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Needs moar of a section on talk page limits. You and I both know a certain user who abuses the talk pages by either adding some +2000 character talk page message per visit, or a three to five paragraph explaining what they did, when it can really be condensed into a single paragraph of like three sentences. To be honest, it's a little unnecessary. D:. --[[User:PsychicRider|<span style="color:#78C850;">'''Psy'''</span>]][[User talk:PsychicRider|<sub style="color:#F85888;">'''ライダー'''</sub>]]''[[Special:Contributions/PsychicRider|<span style="color:#C4E673;">'''☮'''</span>]]'' 11:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||