Talk:List of type combinations by abundance: Difference between revisions

(→‎Headers: new section)
Line 57: Line 57:


Could we change the second header? "Type combinations ranked by their abundance" and "Type combinations and their abundance" sound like they're listing the same thing, and it doesn't quite describe how the second sections lists how many of each type combination was introduced in each generation. [[User:TechSkylander1518|TechSkylander1518]] ([[User talk:TechSkylander1518|talk]]) 21:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Could we change the second header? "Type combinations ranked by their abundance" and "Type combinations and their abundance" sound like they're listing the same thing, and it doesn't quite describe how the second sections lists how many of each type combination was introduced in each generation. [[User:TechSkylander1518|TechSkylander1518]] ([[User talk:TechSkylander1518|talk]]) 21:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
== Arceus and Silvally ==
Should they be under every pure type? [[User:Monkey2371|Monkey2371]] ([[User talk:Monkey2371|talk]]) 16:55, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
18

edits