270
edits
Talk:List of type combinations by abundance: Difference between revisions
Talk:List of type combinations by abundance (view source)
Revision as of 21:26, 2 December 2016
, 2 December 2016→Headers: new section
m (→Unused Type Combinations: Unsigned.) |
(→Headers: new section) |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
In the chart at the bottom, Ghost/Psychic still is listed as zero despite Hoopa being officially revealed, but Fire/Water is listed as one despite Volcanion still being unofficial. This should be changed for consistency purposes, which would bring the total to either 132 (include Hoopa only) or 133 (include both). [[User:Kplaxxc25|Kplaxxc25]] ([[User talk:Kplaxxc25|talk]]) 23:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | In the chart at the bottom, Ghost/Psychic still is listed as zero despite Hoopa being officially revealed, but Fire/Water is listed as one despite Volcanion still being unofficial. This should be changed for consistency purposes, which would bring the total to either 132 (include Hoopa only) or 133 (include both). [[User:Kplaxxc25|Kplaxxc25]] ([[User talk:Kplaxxc25|talk]]) 23:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Headers == | |||
Could we change the second header? "Type combinations ranked by their abundance" and "Type combinations and their abundance" sound like they're listing the same thing, and it doesn't quite describe how the second sections lists how many of each type combination was introduced in each generation. [[User:TechSkylander1518|TechSkylander1518]] ([[User talk:TechSkylander1518|talk]]) 21:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC) | |||