53,551
edits
Talk:EP038: Difference between revisions
m
→Snopes.com
(→Snopes.com: new section) |
m (→Snopes.com) |
||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
Does Snopes[http://www.snopes.com/radiotv/tv/seizure.asp] cast doubt on the statement that this episode "resulted in over seven hundred Japanese people (ranging from 3-58 years old) suffering adverse health effects, including epileptic seizures, vomiting, irritated eyes and other related symptoms, due to use of a flashing strobe effect" (see Snopes link provided)? Thank you in advance for replying! —[[User:The Sackinator|The Sackinator]] ([[User talk:The Sackinator|talk]]) 15:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | Does Snopes[http://www.snopes.com/radiotv/tv/seizure.asp] cast doubt on the statement that this episode "resulted in over seven hundred Japanese people (ranging from 3-58 years old) suffering adverse health effects, including epileptic seizures, vomiting, irritated eyes and other related symptoms, due to use of a flashing strobe effect" (see Snopes link provided)? Thank you in advance for replying! —[[User:The Sackinator|The Sackinator]] ([[User talk:The Sackinator|talk]]) 15:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
:''"Later, researchers who studied the Pokemon phenomenon reported in the Southern Medical Journal that only a small fraction of the 618 children treated were actually diagnosed with photosensitive epilepsy."'' | |||
:The only thing they actually said was false was the ''600 with photosensitive epilepsy''; children could still have been afflicted with any of the other conditions that weren't ''photosensitive epilepsy''. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | |||