172
edits
Talk:EP038: Difference between revisions
→Snopes.com: new section
(→Snopes.com: new section) |
|||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
Are there any lawsuits following this episode? {{unsigned|KirbyKnight123}} | Are there any lawsuits following this episode? {{unsigned|KirbyKnight123}} | ||
:I'm sure there were many lawsuits because of this episode, but no one can seem to find any sources. Also, please sign your future comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. --[[User:Rikeo|<span style="color:#AAAAAA">リック</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Rikeo|<span style="color:#AAAAAA">EO</span>]] [[User talk:Rikeo|<span style="color:#AAAAAA"><small>(メッセージ)</small></span>]] 18:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC) | :I'm sure there were many lawsuits because of this episode, but no one can seem to find any sources. Also, please sign your future comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. --[[User:Rikeo|<span style="color:#AAAAAA">リック</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Rikeo|<span style="color:#AAAAAA">EO</span>]] [[User talk:Rikeo|<span style="color:#AAAAAA"><small>(メッセージ)</small></span>]] 18:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Snopes.com == | |||
Does Snopes[http://www.snopes.com/radiotv/tv/seizure.asp] cast doubt on the statement that this episode "resulted in over seven hundred Japanese people (ranging from 3-58 years old) suffering adverse health effects, including epileptic seizures, vomiting, irritated eyes and other related symptoms, due to use of a flashing strobe effect" (see Snopes link provided)? Thank you in advance for replying! —[[User:The Sackinator|The Sackinator]] ([[User talk:The Sackinator|talk]]) 15:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | |||