Talk:Kenny's Alakazam

Active discussions

Oh you have got to be kidding me! I didn't even think his Prinplup was notable enough let alone his Alakazam. I nominate it for a speedy deletion. --ケンジガール 21:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Poor reasoning was used in creating the page, too. "If we have one on Drew's Butterfree, we can have this too". "Because we have X, why not have Y?" is not a good reason to make a page. Perhaps we shouldn't have X, rather than using it to rationalise Y. --DarkfireTaimatsu 21:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
I personally think that we should keep it. Theryguy512 21:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Well if you feel it should stay then you should put more than a couple sentences of information. --ケンジガール 21:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
I can do that! Theryguy512 21:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
How many more sentences do you want? Theryguy512 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Nine thousand. TTEchidna 05:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
You know, it's articles like this that make me glad we're cracking down on anime Pokémon articles. People, we do not need an article for every single character's Pokémon! As of now, this kid is essentially a character of the day. We have no idea if he will return. Just because Drew's Butterfree (one of the shortest articles we have on Bulbapedia) has an article does not mean this should have one. I support its deletion. --PAK Man Talk 05:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, CotD are nto usually characters that have some sort of past with the main character. It's more than likely that Kenny will reappear. However, until he does, these two articles are probably not notable. On the other hand, the fact that Prinplup had a specific relationship developed (distain -> friendship0 with Piplup would seem to infer that they will appear again... Nothings certain, though, and I would say archive the information somewhere, so that if they do reappear, they can be reentered. That's my position on the two articles. ~Kumori Satosuke 17:36:30, 26 October 2007 (EST)


It's been months since this article was created, and Alakazam has not reappeared. I haven't seen the episode, but I've been told that it didn't really do that much. So, should it be redirected? --PAK Man Talk 20:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Neither have I, but I can't argue there. I agree, come to think of it, Bulbapedia already has too many articles of one-appearance characters. TheBlazikenMaster 20:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Well I've seen the episode (And I was also the creator of this article, but that's besides the point). Kenny used it in a contest, saying that it will put that Jessilina girl in her place. But if you want to delete it, I really can't argue. --Theryguy512 20:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, I'm not deleting it. I'm redirecting it. That way, if it ever appears again and has a major appearance, we can simply undo my edits to it. No biggie.
By the way, don't feel that everything I say goes. That's why I asked before I took action on this page. I like to hear other people's voices before I do something. In fact, I think it's my fault that so many people create so many characters' Pokémon pages to begin with, but that's another story. --PAK Man Talk 20:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
By saying I really can't argue, I meant that there really is no point to keeping it, after all, it only appeared for less than 30 seconds. --Theryguy512 21:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Return to "Kenny's Alakazam" page.