269
edits
Talk:Fake Pokémon: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:::::If we can verify that completely, sure... but only if they're mentioned as "non-Pokémon fake Pokémon". '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 02:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | :::::If we can verify that completely, sure... but only if they're mentioned as "non-Pokémon fake Pokémon". '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 02:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::::Agreed perfectly. I'll get sources when I can. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 03:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | ::::::Agreed perfectly. I'll get sources when I can. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 03:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Incorrect information== | |||
The article currently lists information that is incorrect or inappropriate for this article's subject. "Assumptions of '''real''' Pokémon", key-word "real", indicates that they are not fake. "Previously false assumptions" is also incorrect because not a single one of those assumed Pokémon had any fake artwork for them, with the exception of Leafeon. This article is about FAKE Pokémon, not word-of-mouth mentions of something that may exist, but was never in any way presented as real. Even the recommended Nidogod and Nidogoddess turn up nothing on a Google search; the former a single result on a Spanish forum for fusions, and the latter nothing at all. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 14:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | |||