Talk:List of glitch types (Generation I): Difference between revisions

Line 19: Line 19:


It's bad enough that you people don't consider glitch moves to be notable enough individually, but now you've gone on to the types?!  When was this ridiculous course of action voted upon?  I don't recall anything of the sort taking place!  I would think that something this major would've been announced somewhere!  [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] wants YOU! [[User:Missingno. Master/The Order of the Glitch/Bulbapedia Branch|Join the Order of the Glitch!]] <small>[[User talk: Missingno. Master|(my talk page)]]</small> 12:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
It's bad enough that you people don't consider glitch moves to be notable enough individually, but now you've gone on to the types?!  When was this ridiculous course of action voted upon?  I don't recall anything of the sort taking place!  I would think that something this major would've been announced somewhere!  [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] wants YOU! [[User:Missingno. Master/The Order of the Glitch/Bulbapedia Branch|Join the Order of the Glitch!]] <small>[[User talk: Missingno. Master|(my talk page)]]</small> 12:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
:So, someone just SUGGESTS it on the Pokémaniac talk page, and you automatically do it?!  What about the vote?!  This is major!  Glitch types are just as notable as the regular ones!  I move that we vote upon whether or not this travesty continues.  And for the record, as if it wasn't clear enough already, my vote is to '''undo the merging'''.  [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] wants YOU! [[User:Missingno. Master/The Order of the Glitch/Bulbapedia Branch|Join the Order of the Glitch!]] <small>[[User talk: Missingno. Master|(my talk page)]]</small> 12:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)