Talk:List of glitch types (Generation I): Difference between revisions

m (→‎Pre-merge discussions: look, another one)
Line 15: Line 15:
::Well yes, but because they are all the same with no strengths and no weakesses, couldn't we just have 1 for all of the types?--[[User:SnorlaxMonster|SnorlaxMonster]] 02:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
::Well yes, but because they are all the same with no strengths and no weakesses, couldn't we just have 1 for all of the types?--[[User:SnorlaxMonster|SnorlaxMonster]] 02:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
:::It's still best to do things individually. &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 02:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
:::It's still best to do things individually. &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 02:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
== Whose bright idea was this?!?! ==
It's bad enough that you people don't consider glitch moves to be notable enough individually, but now you've gone on to the types?!  When was this ridiculous course of action voted upon?  I don't recall anything of the sort taking place!  I would think that something this major would've been announced somewhere!  [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] wants YOU! [[User:Missingno. Master/The Order of the Glitch/Bulbapedia Branch|Join the Order of the Glitch!]] <small>[[User talk: Missingno. Master|(my talk page)]]</small> 12:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)