User talk:Capsule Computer: Difference between revisions

Line 7: Line 7:
::Then why are we using the name "Glitter Lighthouse" at all? If it's just an alias. However, I think both names are equally actual. And how do you know that Japanese people call it as such? Because you used Google? Pffft... Japanese Pokemon fansites SUCK. All without exception. They don't have organized fandom like us, so the last thing I'm gonna do is to trust some random result from Japanese Google Search. And please, stop playing a butthurt. If anyone should feel insulted here, it's ME. Because you offended all my years of Pokemon research by going for a proof, implying that I was reverting your edits just to annoy you. I never revert anyone to annoy him, I make edits only to improve Bulbapedia's trustability. I'm a well-estabilished, experienced user and something like you should know it. I never posted any piece of false information on Bulbapedia. If I did, I would be banned long ago. So, please don't pretend that your Google "research" makes you more competent than years-experienced man. I should feel highly offended here but actually I find it rather ridiculous than insulting. It's like David vs. Goliath - Bulbapedia version. LOL. Please, leave corrective work to adults or at least stop playing butthurt. If you think I was being too harsh, sorry. That was neccessary. Go ahead and make relevant edits, you may still regain your good name here. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 09:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
::Then why are we using the name "Glitter Lighthouse" at all? If it's just an alias. However, I think both names are equally actual. And how do you know that Japanese people call it as such? Because you used Google? Pffft... Japanese Pokemon fansites SUCK. All without exception. They don't have organized fandom like us, so the last thing I'm gonna do is to trust some random result from Japanese Google Search. And please, stop playing a butthurt. If anyone should feel insulted here, it's ME. Because you offended all my years of Pokemon research by going for a proof, implying that I was reverting your edits just to annoy you. I never revert anyone to annoy him, I make edits only to improve Bulbapedia's trustability. I'm a well-estabilished, experienced user and something like you should know it. I never posted any piece of false information on Bulbapedia. If I did, I would be banned long ago. So, please don't pretend that your Google "research" makes you more competent than years-experienced man. I should feel highly offended here but actually I find it rather ridiculous than insulting. It's like David vs. Goliath - Bulbapedia version. LOL. Please, leave corrective work to adults or at least stop playing butthurt. If you think I was being too harsh, sorry. That was neccessary. Go ahead and make relevant edits, you may still regain your good name here. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 09:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
{{bp|Code of Conduct}}. Both of you. Especially you, Capsule Computer. Both of you need to lose this attitude, or you'll face a block. &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 09:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
{{bp|Code of Conduct}}. Both of you. Especially you, Capsule Computer. Both of you need to lose this attitude, or you'll face a block. &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 09:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
:Oh, thanks Trom for reminding me that the thing exists. Never got an opportunity to read it. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 09:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
9,883

edits