Talk:Mew (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

Talk:Mew (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate (view source)

Revision as of 23:10, 3 June 2009

492 bytes added , 3 June 2009

→‎Other comments: I'm not saying the article isn't good - to be honest, I haven't evaluated its FAness yet. But let's remember the point of featuring articles

The dark lord trombonator

19,673

edits

Revision as of 23:06, 3 June 2009 (view source) EmpoleonDynamite (talk \| contribs) (→‎Support (15)) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:10, 3 June 2009 (view source) The dark lord trombonator (talk \| contribs) (→‎Other comments: I'm not saying the article isn't good - to be honest, I haven't evaluated its FAness yet. But let's remember the point of featuring articles) Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	====Other comments====		====Other comments====
			OK, fanboys, stop right there. The reason an article gets featured is because it stands out from the rest. Just because it's Pokémon number XYZ to be created, doesn't mean it necessarily gets flaunted. If you cast your vote because you believe the ''Pokémon'' to be special, go back and take a look at what we are actually voting on—the ''article''. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator\|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 23:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)