19,673
edits
(→Frequency of Backlot Pokemon: reply) |
|||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
:Yes, that's right. It's absolutely random. He doesn't cycle through them all before he repeats himself. While it also seems likely that there is a degree of rarity involved, I haven't seen any published evidence of this, just a few fan theorems on forums and whatnot. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 21:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC) | :Yes, that's right. It's absolutely random. He doesn't cycle through them all before he repeats himself. While it also seems likely that there is a degree of rarity involved, I haven't seen any published evidence of this, just a few fan theorems on forums and whatnot. — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 21:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Hmm, in that case, I might do a study sometime, talking to him a certain number of times (Save and restart each time) and recording the data to see if I can figure out the rarities. Should 300 times be enough for good data, or should I go for 500? [[User:TCABF|TCABF]] 21:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC) | ::Hmm, in that case, I might do a study sometime, talking to him a certain number of times (Save and restart each time) and recording the data to see if I can figure out the rarities. Should 300 times be enough for good data, or should I go for 500? [[User:TCABF|TCABF]] 21:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::500's a nice number... — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 02:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
edits