51,133
edits
User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 40709-70709: Difference between revisions
User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 40709-70709 (view source)
Revision as of 16:19, 15 April 2009
, 15 April 2009no edit summary
(→GW: new section) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Um... I don't see how George washington is unnacceptable. I mean, who says he was gonna say he was GW? Say someone had the username "Elvis Lives." Would you ban HIM?--[[User:Totodilesentret|<font color="blue">Totodile</font><font color="brown">sentret!</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Totodilesentret|<font color="gold">Talk to me.</font>]]</sup> 16:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | Um... I don't see how George washington is unnacceptable. I mean, who says he was gonna say he was GW? Say someone had the username "Elvis Lives." Would you ban HIM?--[[User:Totodilesentret|<font color="blue">Totodile</font><font color="brown">sentret!</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Totodilesentret|<font color="gold">Talk to me.</font>]]</sup> 16:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Funny you should mention Elvis, since there was someone who used the handle "{{u|Elvis Presley}}" blocked under the circumstances of impersonating a celebrity. As far as I can tell, impersonating historical figures is along those same lines. | |||
:In any event, the option for the user to create a real username was left open. That's standard procedure for one blocked for unacceptable username not known to commit vandalism or show intent to. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 16:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | |||