95
edits
Appendix talk:Metagame terminology: Difference between revisions
Appendix talk:Metagame terminology (view source)
Revision as of 10:40, 9 November 2008
, 9 November 2008no edit summary
Outrage DD (talk | contribs) (→EV spreads: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
I'm editing out any mention of (exact) EV spreads since for the most part they are opinionative. For example, someone mentioned a 126/126 EV spread for Infernape's offenses saying that is the standard. It is not, and its only the standard with those who are inexperienced and believe that Infernape would benefit more from this spread when it really doesn't ( 126 Atk EVs doesn't OHKO a Blissey and 24 EVs gives a good enough shot). Besides, it sounds too much like we're telling people what to use, and people ''do'' tailorr EV spreads for their specific needs.--[[User:Outrage DD|Outrage DD]] 15:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | I'm editing out any mention of (exact) EV spreads since for the most part they are opinionative. For example, someone mentioned a 126/126 EV spread for Infernape's offenses saying that is the standard. It is not, and its only the standard with those who are inexperienced and believe that Infernape would benefit more from this spread when it really doesn't ( 126 Atk EVs doesn't OHKO a Blissey and 24 EVs gives a good enough shot). Besides, it sounds too much like we're telling people what to use, and people ''do'' tailorr EV spreads for their specific needs.--[[User:Outrage DD|Outrage DD]] 15:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Actually, 126 ATK EVs is enough to OHKO Blissey with Life Orb (any Infernape running 126 / 126 without Life Orb is foolish) and it is the most common Infernape in Wi-Fi Competitive Battling. I'm not saying put it back in there or anything, just pointing that out [[User:Mr. Black|Mr. Black]] 10:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | |||