3,023
edits
Talk:Rotom (Pokémon)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Talk:Rotom (Pokémon)/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 15:06, 13 October 2008
, 13 October 2008→what more proof do you want that rotom is a legendary?!
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
::^And that disproves that Rotom is a legendary... HOW exactly? I mean, Mewtwo was also discovered around that yearspan if not less than that, and it's still counted as a Legendary. I'm not saying that it IS one, just that the whole 50 year discovery =/= legendary mindset isn't a valid reason. [[User:Weedle Mchairybug|Weedle Mchairybug]] 14:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | ::^And that disproves that Rotom is a legendary... HOW exactly? I mean, Mewtwo was also discovered around that yearspan if not less than that, and it's still counted as a Legendary. I'm not saying that it IS one, just that the whole 50 year discovery =/= legendary mindset isn't a valid reason. [[User:Weedle Mchairybug|Weedle Mchairybug]] 14:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Rotom isn't a legendary, get over it. The main reason I can think of off the top of my head is stats. [[User:The Dark Fiddler|The Dark Fiddler]] - [[User talk:The Dark Fiddler|Smarter than the average bear!]] 14:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | :::Rotom isn't a legendary, get over it. The main reason I can think of off the top of my head is stats. [[User:The Dark Fiddler|The Dark Fiddler]] - [[User talk:The Dark Fiddler|Smarter than the average bear!]] 14:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::Did I say it was a legendary? no, I didn't. In fact, I denied saying it was in the response you responded to. Besides, even if I did, in regards to stats, since Phione is canonically a legendary, despite having the same stats as a Glalie, Stats barely mean anything to Legendaries. [[User:Weedle Mchairybug|Weedle Mchairybug]] 15:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | |||