4
edits
Talk:Pokémon world in relation to the real world/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
Talk:Pokémon world in relation to the real world/Featured article candidate (view source)
Revision as of 18:46, 1 October 2008
, 1 October 2008→Object (2)
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
* Definitely nicely made. [[User:JirachiWishmaker0802|JirachiWishmaker0802]] 11:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | * Definitely nicely made. [[User:JirachiWishmaker0802|JirachiWishmaker0802]] 11:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
====Object ( | ====Object (2)==== | ||
Wow, this article is very popular. I however, noticed that much of this artcile is a large chart. I mean, its very acurate in showing what area correlates with that Japanese city/mountain/geographical formation, but I believe a featured article should have a little more to it. All it has it the place and a little blurb about what it is in Japan. Then it goes on to mention other locations mentioned, but I still think the article is a little, well, trivial. --'''[[User:Mooites|Mooites]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Mooites|Talk to me, baby!]]</sup> 04:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | *Wow, this article is very popular. I however, noticed that much of this artcile is a large chart. I mean, its very acurate in showing what area correlates with that Japanese city/mountain/geographical formation, but I believe a featured article should have a little more to it. All it has it the place and a little blurb about what it is in Japan. Then it goes on to mention other locations mentioned, but I still think the article is a little, well, trivial. --'''[[User:Mooites|Mooites]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Mooites|Talk to me, baby!]]</sup> 04:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
*It's an interesting idea, but the Comments section of the chart feels very.. empty. I wanted to read more about the details of these places and what makes them so similar to the games, not just the names of the locations! They don't make much effort to fill in the huge number of blank blocks they have in that chart. I'm also not sure that it's anything more than a series of general observations. It's entirely speculative - which is fun, and the accuracy is impressive, but it's still empty and not necessarily 100% factual. Again, I'm only talking about the chart here. The real world references in the Pokedex entries are factual and indeed awesome. Unfortunately that doesn't make up for the bulk of the article.. -- [[User:Butterfreelover!|Cayh]] | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||