934
edits
User talk:Aura-Knight: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Unown Lord (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Aura-Knight (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
::5. 2011 is the safest assumption; it is a reasonable timeframe for both the next system ''and'' generation, and to say that one could be pushed further back while the other would have to come sooner, requires a better explanation than the one you have provided. Once again, new Pokémon and region are not sufficient conditions for a new generation. Had Gold and Silver been released for the Game Boy, they would have ended up being a shadow of their true selves; the decision to release them for a new Game Boy system gave way to the creation of the term "generation" in Pokémon's context. -[[User:Unown Lord|Unown Lord]] 10:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | ::5. 2011 is the safest assumption; it is a reasonable timeframe for both the next system ''and'' generation, and to say that one could be pushed further back while the other would have to come sooner, requires a better explanation than the one you have provided. Once again, new Pokémon and region are not sufficient conditions for a new generation. Had Gold and Silver been released for the Game Boy, they would have ended up being a shadow of their true selves; the decision to release them for a new Game Boy system gave way to the creation of the term "generation" in Pokémon's context. -[[User:Unown Lord|Unown Lord]] 10:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::You make a logical arguement and I can see the point of keeping the info on the page. I did not mean to insult you about the subjective comment, opinions are rampant on this wiki, so I generally ask that of people and in no way was it a comment about you personally. I will stand by my thoughts, but you present a stronger case than I do. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 21:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||