5,698
edits
User talk:Prophaniti: Difference between revisions
→Edit Summary
Prophaniti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Is it genuinely forbidden to revert admins? This seems rather silly. After all, if an admin's change is a sound one, the admin should be able to defend it with logical argument and reason. If they can't, then obviously it's not a very good change. In other words, I don't see the need for an ability to hide behind a title and be able to do anything without having to justify it. With regards to the change in question, I have put an explanation on the talk page. [[User:Prophaniti|Prophaniti]] 22:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | Is it genuinely forbidden to revert admins? This seems rather silly. After all, if an admin's change is a sound one, the admin should be able to defend it with logical argument and reason. If they can't, then obviously it's not a very good change. In other words, I don't see the need for an ability to hide behind a title and be able to do anything without having to justify it. With regards to the change in question, I have put an explanation on the talk page. [[User:Prophaniti|Prophaniti]] 22:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:its not generally forbidden, but some users think it is[[User:Darth Cookie Monster|<span style="color:##800000;">Good Day;DCM</span>]] | |||