120,906
edits
Talk:Move variations: Difference between revisions
→Petition to redefine a "move variation"
CuteShaymin (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 741: | Line 741: | ||
I believe that just having the same power, accuracy, and PP should not be enough to classify two or more moves as being "variations" of each other. If two moves have different added effects from each other, they should not have the right to be called variations of each other. For convenience sake, the criteria of a "move variation" should be that they must be purely identical except for type and category. I think the definition of what makes moves variations of each other needs to be refined. --[[User:CuteShaymin|CuteShaymin]] ([[User talk:CuteShaymin|talk]]) 23:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) | I believe that just having the same power, accuracy, and PP should not be enough to classify two or more moves as being "variations" of each other. If two moves have different added effects from each other, they should not have the right to be called variations of each other. For convenience sake, the criteria of a "move variation" should be that they must be purely identical except for type and category. I think the definition of what makes moves variations of each other needs to be refined. --[[User:CuteShaymin|CuteShaymin]] ([[User talk:CuteShaymin|talk]]) 23:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
:I personally think the current definition of a move variation is fitting. Having the same power, PP, accuracy, and chance for a secondary effect makes moves similar enough for them to count as intentionally made variations of each other. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 23:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC) | |||