846
edits
Talk:Move variations: Difference between revisions
→Petition to redefine a "move variation": new section
CuteShaymin (talk | contribs) (→Petition to redefine a "move variation": new section) |
|||
| Line 737: | Line 737: | ||
::I've fixed the template so there's now space for "secondary effects" and "signature moves" explicitly. I've also removed the "Power", "accuracy", "notes on power", and "notes on accuracy" headers, since the page says one of the requirements for two moves to be a move variation is that they have to have the same power and accuracy. I'll go over the page to check where these could replace the "Notes" section. [[User:Zwemvest|Zwemvest]] ([[User talk:Zwemvest|talk]]) 12:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | ::I've fixed the template so there's now space for "secondary effects" and "signature moves" explicitly. I've also removed the "Power", "accuracy", "notes on power", and "notes on accuracy" headers, since the page says one of the requirements for two moves to be a move variation is that they have to have the same power and accuracy. I'll go over the page to check where these could replace the "Notes" section. [[User:Zwemvest|Zwemvest]] ([[User talk:Zwemvest|talk]]) 12:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Petition to redefine a "move variation" == | |||
I believe that just having the same power, accuracy, and PP should not be enough to classify two or more moves as being "variations" of each other. If two moves have different added effects from each other, they should not have the right to be called variations of each other. I think the definition of what makes moves variations of each other needs to be refined. --[[User:CuteShaymin|CuteShaymin]] ([[User talk:CuteShaymin|talk]]) 23:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) | |||