Talk:First partner Pokémon: Difference between revisions

m
Line 797: Line 797:
:::This article also acknowledges that the term "starter Pokémon" exists anyway. I know that some people on Twitter were complaining about an old screenshot which specifically read "A first partner Pokémon, previously known as a starter Pokémon [...]" but that kind of incorrect wording was short-lived. It was revised about a month ago and the article does not say that anymore.
:::This article also acknowledges that the term "starter Pokémon" exists anyway. I know that some people on Twitter were complaining about an old screenshot which specifically read "A first partner Pokémon, previously known as a starter Pokémon [...]" but that kind of incorrect wording was short-lived. It was revised about a month ago and the article does not say that anymore.
:::If you are thinking of other public spaces and would like to ask people at some point "Why are you singling out Bulbapedia when this website did not invent the term 'first partner' which has actually been used in other places for at least 13 years?", please let me know the answer if/when that happens. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 06:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:::If you are thinking of other public spaces and would like to ask people at some point "Why are you singling out Bulbapedia when this website did not invent the term 'first partner' which has actually been used in other places for at least 13 years?", please let me know the answer if/when that happens. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 06:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I think you kind of miss the point, Bulbapedia is an encyclopedia, our job is to present information "as it is" not "as fans would like it to be".  '''[[User:4iamking|<span style="font-family:noteworthy;color:#FF1493">4iam</span><span style="font-family:papyrus;color:#8A2BE2">king</span>]]''' 07:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)