12,092
edits
Talk:Type: Difference between revisions
→Bird type
m (→Bird type) |
Storm Aurora (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1,355: | Line 1,355: | ||
:::::Anyway, what distinguishes the Bird type from glitch types is the fact that it has ''more'' information/data (such as a proper name or index number), and the fact that there's intent behind it in the first place. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 13:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC) | :::::Anyway, what distinguishes the Bird type from glitch types is the fact that it has ''more'' information/data (such as a proper name or index number), and the fact that there's intent behind it in the first place. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 13:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::::I think it deserves a page just on the basis of it being the only internally defined distinct type without its own page, regardless of how limited the information on it is. The draft that Nescientist linked really isn't that much shorter than the currently mainspaced {{t|???}} page. [[User:Minibug|Minibug]] ([[User talk:Minibug|talk]]) 14:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC) | ::::::I think it deserves a page just on the basis of it being the only internally defined distinct type without its own page, regardless of how limited the information on it is. The draft that Nescientist linked really isn't that much shorter than the currently mainspaced {{t|???}} page. [[User:Minibug|Minibug]] ([[User talk:Minibug|talk]]) 14:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::::::If we have an individual page for the Bird type, wouldn't it be added to {{template|types}}? I worry that could confuse people into thinking it's a fully functional type. [[User:Storm Aurora|'''<span style="background:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#9CB8C6,#625A88);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent;">Storm Aurora</span>''']] ([[User talk:Storm Aurora|talk]]) 16:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC) | |||