Pokémon controversy: Difference between revisions

Pokémon controversy (view source)

3 bytes added , 12 January

→‎Gambling: Lottery is not gambling, and I'm not sure if these two count either.

120,777

edits

@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 In the [[Virtual Console]] re-releases of the [[Generation I]] and {{gen|II}} games, however, the Game Corner was left completely untouched, although the games did receive the higher-than-usual age rating of twelve and up by PEGI (compared to all other contemporary main-series titles, which PEGI gave a rating of seven and up).
-There are other gambling methods such as the [[Pokémon Lottery Corner]], the [[Cram-o-matic]] and the [[Item Printer]] that continue to exist through out the games. But the difference with the Cram-o-matic and the Item Printer versus other methods is the player will always be rewarded with random items or pokéballs.
+There are other gambling methods that exist in later games, such as the [[Cram-o-matic]] and the [[Item Printer]]. The difference is that instead of having a chance to reward the player, these machines always provide the player with items instead of money, the only luck-based factor being the rarity of the obtained item.
 In {{wp|Saudi Arabia}}, the [[Pokémon Trading Card Game|TCG]] was blocked for a while<!--from when to when?--> because it “promoted gambling and Zionism”.{{fact}}