Talk:Energy card (TCG): Difference between revisions

(→‎Designs: new section)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 15: Line 15:


I might be going a bit overkill with my masterset collection but I would like to add the relevent to nergy cards to the sets they were introduced so for instance team up had a new energy card design in the sun and moon era and will therefore have a copy of each relevent energy type added to the end of the binder. I'm therefore wondering if we can get a gallery of the different energy card designs and the sets which they were introduced [[User:Silent Scyther|Silent Scyther]] ([[User talk:Silent Scyther|talk]]) 10:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
I might be going a bit overkill with my masterset collection but I would like to add the relevent to nergy cards to the sets they were introduced so for instance team up had a new energy card design in the sun and moon era and will therefore have a copy of each relevent energy type added to the end of the binder. I'm therefore wondering if we can get a gallery of the different energy card designs and the sets which they were introduced [[User:Silent Scyther|Silent Scyther]] ([[User talk:Silent Scyther|talk]]) 10:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
== Were names changed in SV? ==
I was just about to add a note saying the SV set changed the name of the Basic Energy cards to be Basic [Type] Energy instead of [Type] Energy, but when I checked the [https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/pokemon-tcg-scarlet-violet-brings-changes-to-the-pokemon-trading-card-game Pokemon.com article] announcing the change, it said that "The name of the Energy will now be featured on the top of the card..." Which, if taken literally, would mean that the card's names were always Basic [Type] Energy. Which then means that all of the card indexing sites calling the old cards [Type] Energy, including ourselves, are incorrect. Does anyone have any opinions on this? I'm confused. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 03:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
1,467

edits