12,158
edits
No edit summary |
Nescientist (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Mystery Attack == | |||
Can we get the possible outcomes of Mystery Attack and their probabilities? [[User:Jdrawer|Jdrawer]] ([[User talk:Jdrawer|talk]]) 00:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | Can we get the possible outcomes of Mystery Attack and their probabilities? [[User:Jdrawer|Jdrawer]] ([[User talk:Jdrawer|talk]]) 00:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
:As far as I can tell from the disassembly of the US release, there are 8 equally likely outcomes (assuming the game's PRNG is uniformly random in the last 8 bits):- | :As far as I can tell from the disassembly of the US release, there are 8 equally likely outcomes (assuming the game's PRNG is uniformly random in the last 8 bits):- | ||
Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
:However, I don't think this has a place in the main article as it has been extracted directly from the game with no easy way to independently verify it. --[[User:AdituV|AdituV]] ([[User talk:AdituV|talk]]) 10:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC) | :However, I don't think this has a place in the main article as it has been extracted directly from the game with no easy way to independently verify it. --[[User:AdituV|AdituV]] ([[User talk:AdituV|talk]]) 10:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
::I would certainly disagree. Correct information is absolutely worth being on here, and can (in theory) even be verified empirically in-game. (It's basically the same case as, say, the chance of moves having [[additional effect]]s.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 17:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |