206
edits
Talk:Version-exclusive Pokémon: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 308: | Line 308: | ||
== Fix unnecessary letters == | == Fix unnecessary letters == | ||
I'd like to suggest Scarlet and Violet's abbreviations from "Sc" and "Vi" to simply "S" and "V". It was good for Sword and Shield since they start with the same letter, but Scarlet and Violet don't.[[User:PinkYoshiGaming|PinkYoshiGaming]] ([[User talk:PinkYoshiGaming|talk]]) 04:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC) | I'd like to suggest Scarlet and Violet's abbreviations from "Sc" and "Vi" to simply "S" and "V". It was good for Sword and Shield since they start with the same letter, but Scarlet and Violet don't.[[User:PinkYoshiGaming|PinkYoshiGaming]] ([[User talk:PinkYoshiGaming|talk]]) 04:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Remove Pokemon evolved via trading only? == | |||
Would it make more sense to remove Pokemon that can only be evolved into via trading and not available via other means in a game? Requiring trading in some way to acquire kinda defeats the point of being exclusive to a version without trading. Probably worth noting that in all paired versions other than B2W2 (unless I missed something in SV), the version-exclusive mons do not include any evolutions that can only be acquired via trading within the corresponding regional dex (Slowking and Scizor are not in the regional dex in FRLG and DP, for example) | |||