Talk:Tatsugiri (Pokémon): Difference between revisions

(Created page with "==== Anglerfish Inspiration ==== Wanna clear things up here regarding the potential anglerfish inspiration for Tatsugiri and Dondozo, and why I think it should remain in the o...")
 
Line 12: Line 12:
* Origins are largely speculative anyway. Most origin entries (including how I wrote the Anglerfish one) say this ‘may be based on’ or ‘may reference’ or ‘may be inspired by’. There’s no reason to remove it as a potential origin unless there is evidence directly to the contrary.
* Origins are largely speculative anyway. Most origin entries (including how I wrote the Anglerfish one) say this ‘may be based on’ or ‘may reference’ or ‘may be inspired by’. There’s no reason to remove it as a potential origin unless there is evidence directly to the contrary.
[[User:Silverbrick|Silverbrick]] ([[User talk:Silverbrick|talk]]) 10:11, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
[[User:Silverbrick|Silverbrick]] ([[User talk:Silverbrick|talk]]) 10:11, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
I think this falls under the same category as the "tongue-eating isopod" hypothesis that was being floated a while back-- while there's some superficial similarities, I don't think it's enough to consider it an influence on the design. Tatsugiri isn't a parasite, and Anglerfish aren't the only fish that use lures or other bait strategies to hunt (e.g. Dragonfish are not anglerfish but have the same hunting strategy and gender size discrepancy-- and a more relevant name!). It might be an interesting bit of trivia to discuss fishes that use lures and baits in general, but I don't think Anglerfish ''specifically'' are relevant enough to Tatsugiri and Dondozo to get a specific mention.
[[User:Auricolor|Auricolor]] ([[User talk:Auricolor|talk]]) 19:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
6

edits