2,252
edits
User talk:Pale Prism: Difference between revisions
→Specialists
No edit summary |
Pale Prism (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
Battle them multiple times don't mean so much... because the team remain unchanged. I could understand if they had different species in multiple battles, but nope. They use the same Pokémon in every battle, and are way too few ro be considered specialists at all. And I have this same opinion for Lillie too--[[User:Zarxiel94|Zarxiel94]] ([[User talk:Zarxiel94|talk]]) 06:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC) | Battle them multiple times don't mean so much... because the team remain unchanged. I could understand if they had different species in multiple battles, but nope. They use the same Pokémon in every battle, and are way too few ro be considered specialists at all. And I have this same opinion for Lillie too--[[User:Zarxiel94|Zarxiel94]] ([[User talk:Zarxiel94|talk]]) 06:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
:I'm mostly just going off of what [[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] has said. According to them, two pokémon is enough for a character to be considered a specialist. | |||
:Yes, it's strange for only two members of a specific trainer class to be specialists, but why can't they be? I also think that it's fine to treat each Shadow as an individual, and it <em>could</em> be the case that the dark-type specialisation for one of them is a coincidence, but it could also be that Game Freak decided that he specifically <em>really</em> loves dark-types. Overall, as we can't know exactly what the devs intended, it makes sense (to me) to use a consistent, descriptive standard for all characters. — '''[[User:Pale Prism|<span style="color:#FAA;">⚫︎ Pale</span> <span style="color:#AAF;">Prism ⬟</span>]]''' <small style="color: #666;">[ [[User talk:Pale Prism|<span style="color:#666;">Talk</span>]] ■ [[Special:Contributions/Pale Prism|<span style="color:#666;">Contribs</span>]] ]</small> 00:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC) | |||