51,133
edits
CastformRED (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Subst-ing signature template) |
||
Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
[[User:CastformRED|CastformRED]] 07:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC) | [[User:CastformRED|CastformRED]] 07:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
Just because that would take forevere I am going to suggest you use Alt + F and Search for what you need to find. | Just because that would take forevere I am going to suggest you use Alt + F and Search for what you need to find.<span style="background:#000000;">[[User:Crystallucario|<span style="color:#FF0000;">'''''Crystal'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Crystallucario|<span style="color:#FF0000;">'''''Lucario'''''</span>]]</span> 11:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
Oh, it's not about my convenience. I have already started work on it, as I said. I suggested doing this because even with the large amount of items on the page, there still isn't detailed info on all the items, and there are several that are missing. I could have added in the missing items, but that would just add to the page size. The way I suggested would make it more like a mini-directory leading to the appropriate detailed item page, like the examples given above. But still, do you or anyone else have any suggestion to improve this type of view? [[User:CastformRED|CastformRED]] 13:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC) | Oh, it's not about my convenience. I have already started work on it, as I said. I suggested doing this because even with the large amount of items on the page, there still isn't detailed info on all the items, and there are several that are missing. I could have added in the missing items, but that would just add to the page size. The way I suggested would make it more like a mini-directory leading to the appropriate detailed item page, like the examples given above. But still, do you or anyone else have any suggestion to improve this type of view? [[User:CastformRED|CastformRED]] 13:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
edits