34,207
edits
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I'm pretty sure locations and levels are more relevant than types for this article. Also it's much easier to add missing Pokemon to tables that are formatted like this. [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Sumwun|contribs]]) 19:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC) | I'm pretty sure locations and levels are more relevant than types for this article. Also it's much easier to add missing Pokemon to tables that are formatted like this. [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Sumwun|contribs]]) 19:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Sure, I like that idea. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 00:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC) | :Sure, I like that idea. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 00:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
::[[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] - Thanks for improving the tables. I think we can agree that the list with added details is better than before. Please keep up the good work. | |||
::However, I think the previous style (a simple table with images and no text) was nice too. So I disagree with you saying it was bad in the edit summary. As in, you're free to think the previous style was bad in your opinion, but my opinion is different. | |||
::When I reverted that earlier revision, it was just a small incomplete Emerald table with 2 Pokémon. As you know, the information was not even lost; it was kept in the old revision in case you would like to use it and keep making tables using that style. | |||
::I'm still not a big fan of having an inconsistent style like we still have now, but about half of the tables are converted so I guess we can keep them until all the work can be done. I added a template requesting the work to be finished when possible. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 23:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC) |