11,900
edits
Talk:List of Pokémon by availability: Difference between revisions
Talk:List of Pokémon by availability (view source)
Revision as of 17:33, 19 August 2020
, 19 August 2020→Merge D and G
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 267: | Line 267: | ||
::I don't like your ideas for a rename either. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 17:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | ::I don't like your ideas for a rename either. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 17:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::I think the background should remain white because the Pokemon isn't normally obtainable, even though it's caught in-game. EV's background is white for the same reason. So both of you agree that Pokemon that require communication to catch, including dual-slot Pokemon, should be marked "G", not "TC" or "CC"? [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Sumwun|contribs]]) 17:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | :::I think the background should remain white because the Pokemon isn't normally obtainable, even though it's caught in-game. EV's background is white for the same reason. So both of you agree that Pokemon that require communication to catch, including dual-slot Pokemon, should be marked "G", not "TC" or "CC"? [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Sumwun|contribs]]) 17:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::I think the key should really be order of priority, and everything above "Not obtainable in-game" should have a background, while everything below shouldn't. The cases are similar, that's why you proposed to merge them, right? So, especially after merging 'D' into 'G', it should have a background. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 17:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | |||