Talk:Ultra Beast: Difference between revisions

m
Answering KnightGalarie's question
m (Answering KnightGalarie's question)
Line 204: Line 204:
::The Gen VI GTS certainly makes it good and confusing. But any statement that cannot give a clear answer is going to be much less weighty than a statment that clearly ''separates'' them from Legendary Pokemon. If it were once, that'd just be contradictory. But when it's twice and even [[Talk:Legendary Pokémon#Ultra Beasts confirmed as Non-Legendaries?|three]] times, then it's not worth agonizing over. They have to all appearances made up their mind now.
::The Gen VI GTS certainly makes it good and confusing. But any statement that cannot give a clear answer is going to be much less weighty than a statment that clearly ''separates'' them from Legendary Pokemon. If it were once, that'd just be contradictory. But when it's twice and even [[Talk:Legendary Pokémon#Ultra Beasts confirmed as Non-Legendaries?|three]] times, then it's not worth agonizing over. They have to all appearances made up their mind now.
::Regarding "why are they considered a product that ''failed'' to emulate Arceus?", I assume you're talking about the story lore. And it's not our place to "correct" story lore or anything. Ask GameFreak if you want an answer. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 00:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
::Regarding "why are they considered a product that ''failed'' to emulate Arceus?", I assume you're talking about the story lore. And it's not our place to "correct" story lore or anything. Ask GameFreak if you want an answer. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 00:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
::: To ([[User talk:KnightGalarie|talk]]), That's because Type:Null and Silvally were confirmed Legendary Pokemon to be during the Year of Legendary Pokemon, the same one event that confirmed Ultra Beasts were not Legendary Pokemon.--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob9594 ]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 01:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
5,782

edits