User talk:FinnishPokéFan92/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Line 77: Line 77:
:I see you also [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=DP104&diff=3101347&oldid=3101338 reverted this change] I made without reason. If you believe I was wrong, say so in the edit description. However in this case the reason why I made this edit is because the wallbreaking only occurs in the English dub and not in the Japanese original. So if you're going to move it back to "trivia" the least you could do is make it say "in the English dub,". --[[User:Dada|Dada]] ([[User talk:Dada|talk]]) 16:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
:I see you also [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=DP104&diff=3101347&oldid=3101338 reverted this change] I made without reason. If you believe I was wrong, say so in the edit description. However in this case the reason why I made this edit is because the wallbreaking only occurs in the English dub and not in the Japanese original. So if you're going to move it back to "trivia" the least you could do is make it say "in the English dub,". --[[User:Dada|Dada]] ([[User talk:Dada|talk]]) 16:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
::The first one was because characters of the day aren't listed as debuts, splitting the double character link was unnecessary, and the last sentence didn't need to be split away from the big paragraph. The second one was because fourth wall breaks are listed in the trivia section, even if they're dub only. Also, be aware that you can edit the whole page at once instead of just one section at a time. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 18:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
::The first one was because characters of the day aren't listed as debuts, splitting the double character link was unnecessary, and the last sentence didn't need to be split away from the big paragraph. The second one was because fourth wall breaks are listed in the trivia section, even if they're dub only. Also, be aware that you can edit the whole page at once instead of just one section at a time. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 18:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
:::Here's the problem: when you removed all my edits, without edit reason or anything, you seem to have deleted more than you intended, judging on your message here. That's why I edit sections at a time instead of the whole page: because it allows me to explain the purpose of each edit.
:::Next time, use an edit reason instead of treating me like I'm a spambot whose content can just be thrown out like garbage. It's only a basic courtesy towards your fellow editors, all of whom are here in our spare time. I understand that this is a wiki and everything we write here is going to be edited by others, but giving a reason for it is only a basic thing. And not to mention, if you don't do that, the only thing that will happen is I'll edit it back in because I can't understand the reason why you removed it.
:::The things you did not acknowledge:
:::1) your revert on DP104. Can you at least just admit that you should've added "in the dub only" to that sentence, and that reverting it with no edit reason and no message either on my talk page or on the talk page of the article is incredibly suspicious?
:::2) you removed my addition regarding the conversation Delia has with Ash, and you removed my addition on [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=DP138&diff=3125109&oldid=3125106 line 129] regarding the title card. '''That's why you should not carelessly be reverting entire pages. You removed content that you didn't intend to remove.''' You apparently did that just because one sentence was split off from the rest. Did you not notice you removed those other things too?
:::3) I also removed a line in the errors section because it wasn't an error. You didn't mention any reason for removing it just now, so I'm assuming you also put that back in without realizing it by reverting the whole page.
:::It's difficult to assume good faith when you're just removing entire edits with apparently not having any reason for it. Please don't do it again and be careful next time, and if you're going to revert anything, make sure it's for a valid reason. ''I would absolutely do the same thing for you, and I don't think I'm being unreasonable here by asking that you do the same thing.'' --[[User:Dada|Dada]] ([[User talk:Dada|talk]]) 14:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
179

edits