86,550
edits
Talk:Pokémon in Greater China: Difference between revisions
→Split
Mr. Daikon (talk | contribs) (→Split) |
(→Split) |
||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
::: I do find it interesting that this logic isn't applied to western countries. For example, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark all get their own pages despite their similarities. But the main reason I think they should be split is because as the article currently stands, it goes back and forth between Taiwan and Hong Kong, and is poorly written as a result. If the information was split in multiple pages, it would be easier to understand, as at least for the long time, the Pokémon ftanchise was handled differently in the two countries. Thus, I think the two are deserving of their own pages. [[User:Mr. Daikon|Mr. Daikon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Daikon|talk]]) 04:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC) | ::: I do find it interesting that this logic isn't applied to western countries. For example, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark all get their own pages despite their similarities. But the main reason I think they should be split is because as the article currently stands, it goes back and forth between Taiwan and Hong Kong, and is poorly written as a result. If the information was split in multiple pages, it would be easier to understand, as at least for the long time, the Pokémon ftanchise was handled differently in the two countries. Thus, I think the two are deserving of their own pages. [[User:Mr. Daikon|Mr. Daikon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Daikon|talk]]) 04:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::Do remember: "'''there's a bit of a shared language and history among the regions.'''" Norway, Sweden, and Denmark have always been their own countries. They even have their own languages. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 04:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC) | |||